Another weapon used against parents is an accusation of “negligence of education”. “This spring in New York City some school officials allegedly called child advocates when students were not enrolled online, potentially leading to children being taken away from their families. From bright red pencils with the inscription “My presence is important” to countless plaques, ribbons, trophies, certificates and gold stars, attending classes – and rewarding children for their presence – has always been a respected school ritual. It all boils down to aparadigm shift,'” says Hedi Chang, who leads theAttendance Work’, a national and government initiative that considers school attendance an important factor in students’ success. While funding has been suspended, the question arises as to whether, with schools already facing massive spending cuts and additional burdens, overly liberal attendance policies can allow schools to go unpunished and falsely claim how many students they have and how well they are doing. Maria Jose Romero, a sociologist at the University of Pace who has studied school attendance for decades, describes it as “information of great political importance,” which became stronger only because it became the measure of school responsibility. Chan hopes that communication in the family will become an important part of the “positive and problematic approach. “The installation of home appliances and Internet connection is a basic need that is estimated to be unmet by millions of students. And when the school is supported personally, strict coronavirus treatment protocols mean that students must stay home at the slightest signs of illness or be quarantined in case of possible exposure. Paolo DeMaria, Ohio’s head of public education, says “he” is trying to change districts to recognize that students are making progress. The tricky question for schools right now is how exactly will they count “presence” if elearning doesn’t always mean they will appear through videoconferencing. Principals interviewed for this story talked a lot about the need to keep the lines of communication open to remove barriers to elearning or to reassure parents about the assurances of on-site learning. They found that a lack of more than 10% of school days per year is an “early warning sign” for students with low grades and ultimately for students who drop out, and that this has a disproportionate impact on students with low incomes. School systems have responded to the new pressure of federal law by attempting to increase school attendance with carrots and sticks. Not only did students perform at school, but school performance will also be determined by this indicator: how many children lost more than 10% of their days during the school year. Their title – Presence and Disciplinary Coordination – suggests that historical presence belongs to the category of student behavior that should be rewarded or punished. In addition, schools must update the contact details of all students, “he” says. Partly as a result of this study, the federal law “On the Overall Success of Every Student” came into effect in 2015, which increases the use of attendance.